madison.com  Marketplace | Jobs | Autos | Homes | Rentals | Obits | Weather | Archives  

WSJ homeAnnouncementsBook of businessClassifieds searchEntertainmentPhoto reprintsStory archivesContact staffEamil a letter to the editor

Reader Services
Subscribe
Renew your subscription
Temporary stop
Carrier opportunities
Newspapers In Education
> More reader services

Advertiser services:
Place a Classified ad
Media kit
Digital file requirements
> More advertiser services


Special reports
Madison public art
 
Community links
Freedom's answer
 

Doyle, legislators agree on power plan
10:50 PM 10/27/03
Melissa Trujillo Associated Press

Legislators and the governor agreed on a bill Monday that would streamline the process for approving power plants and transmission lines. <

The measure calls for the Public Service Commission and the Department of Natural Resources to work simultaneously on applications and to fast-track less complex projects. <

The bill came about after Gov. Jim Doyle issued an executive order requiring the DNR and PSC to develop ways to streamline the approval process after a massive power blackout hit parts of the Midwest and Northeast in August. <

"If we don't have alternative transmission capabilities, we are really at the mercy of one of those hiccups happening in Ohio significantly affecting life here in Wisconsin," Doyle said. <

Four major transmission lines bring power into Wisconsin. Illinois has 25 and Minnesota has 18. <

Projects like new power plants or transmission lines need approval from the PSC, which regulates utilities, and the DNR, which is the state's environmental agency. <

Currently, the DNR usually doesn't begin considering an application until the PSC has approved it, which could take up to a year, said PSC spokesman Dan Ebert. <

Sen. Robert Cowles, R-Green Bay, chairman of the Senate Energy and Utilities Committee, said utilities need quicker approval so they can meet Wisconsin's growing energy demand. <

"We're going to get squeezed as time goes by," Cowles said. <

Under the new bill, each agency would consider an application together and work with the applicant to identify sticking points before the process begins. <

The agencies also would have to decide on the same type of environmental review. <

"What's envisioned with this legislation is to formalize a process so the applicant is working with both agencies up front and there's no surprises late in the game," said Dave Siebert, acting director of the DNR's Office of Energy. <

The bill also would: <

  • Set out priorities for selecting locations for new transmission lines. The agencies' first choice of a site would be existing utility corridors along highways and railroads. Building a new corridor would be a last resort. <

  • Force the agencies to expedite applications to upgrade existing transmission lines. <

  • Extend the PSC's 180-day review deadlines for interstate transmission lines and gas pipelines. <

  • Copyright © 2003 Wisconsin State Journal


    News from AP

    1st Senate vote looms on health legislation

    Obama trumpets Asia trip as boost to US economy

    Levin: could be more e-mails from Ft. Hood suspect

    US to drop shooting case against Blackwater guard

    GOP: Health test recommendations could affect care

    Italian police arrest 2 linked to Mumbai attacks

    Quick restart of Big Bang machine stuns scientists

    Postal Service to resume North Pole Santa letters

    Michael Jackson glove among items at music auction

    Syracuse runs away from No. 6 North Carolina