madison.com  Marketplace | Jobs | Autos | Homes | Rentals | Obits | Weather | Archives  

WSJ homeAnnouncementsBook of businessClassifieds searchEntertainmentPhoto reprintsStory archivesContact staffEamil a letter to the editor

Reader Services
Subscribe
Renew your subscription
Temporary stop
Carrier opportunities
Newspapers In Education
> More reader services

Advertiser services:
Place a Classified ad
Media kit
Digital file requirements
> More advertiser services


Special reports
Madison public art
 
Community links
Freedom's answer
 

Jensen, Foti lose motions in court
10:10 AM 1/10/03
Ed Treleven Courts reporter

Criminal charges against two top Assembly Republicans and a former aide will continue after a Dane County judge on Friday denied their motions to dismiss the charges.

Circuit Judge Daniel Moeser also turned down a request by lawyers for former Assembly Speaker Scott Jensen, R-Waukesha, Majority Leader Steven Foti, R-Oconomowoc, and former Foti aide Sherry Schultz to delay a three-day preliminary hearing, slated for next week, while they appeal Moeser's decision.

Attorneys for Jensen, Foti and Schultz sought to dismiss the criminal complaint against them, which charges each with felonies for allegedly conducting campaign activities using taxpayer resources.

The charges stem from an 18-month John Doe investigation that began after a series of stories in the Wisconsin State Journal about alleged illegal campaign activities by the Legislature's now-defunct partisan caucuses.

State Rep. Bonnie Ladwig, R-Mount Pleasant, a co-defendant of Jensen, Foti and Schultz, faces a misdemeanor charge. Sen. Chuck Chvala, D-Madison, and former Democratic Sen. Brian Burke, have been charged with multiple felonies in separate criminal complaints.

Frank Gimbel, Stephen Meyer and Stephen Morgan, attorneys for Foti, Jensen and Schultz, argued that the misconduct statute under which they were charged is unconstitutionally vague and that they shouldn't be prosecuted for doing the jobs they were elected or hired to do, a notion challenged by District Attorney Brian Blanchard.

"The defendants are trying to create the idea that their responsibility to seek re-election protects them from any responsibility to fulfill their duties as public officials, not to abuse the public trust," Blanchard said. "That's a non sequitur. That's really a means and ends argument."

The lawyers also claimed Blanchard inappropriately charged their clients with felonies when their alleged acts were, at most, misdemeanors under state campaign finance and election laws.

In particular, each of the attorneys attacked the complaint because they said it didn't spell out the duties of their clients and what they were doing that was inconsistent with those duties.

But Moeser said, while it takes a little work to discern the duties of the three in the complaint, "reasonable inferences" of them do exist and make it clear that Jensen, Foti and Schultz knew that what they were doing was wrong.

"It is not a duty of employment to use state time, money and resources to solicit money and assist in private campaigns or to direct somebody to do it," Moeser said. "And I think that's easily discernible from the statutes."

Copyright © 2003 Wisconsin State Journal


News from AP

Bush hails G-8 work on climate change

Iran test-fires missiles in Persian Gulf, Hormouz

Senate to pass bill overhauling eavesdropping rules

Wildfire near Sacramento burns dozens of homes

General says Iraqi security forces still need help

Panel calls for new war powers legislation

Fed to curb shady home-lending practices

Oil rebounds slightly after second big drop

Matthew McConaughey, girlfriend welcome baby boy

Sabathia wild, but a winner in Brewers debut