|
Supreme Court candidates present their cases at forum
6:15 PM
1/30/03
Anita Clark Wisconsin State Journal
Each of three candidates for the Wisconsin Supreme Court assured an audience of lawyers Tuesday that he or she has precisely the right qualifications to join the state's highest court.
They also sparred over how to pay for judicial campaigns and whether judges should express their opinion on abortion rights.
About 200 people attended the forum at the Concourse Hotel, sponsored by the Dane County Bar Association, for the candidates, one of whom will be eliminated in the non-partisan Feb. 18 primary election.
The candidates:
Edward Brunner, 54, Rice Lake, a circuit judge in Barron County and chief judge of his 13-county district, who emphasizes his legal and community experience and insists that judicial candidates should not accept donations from political action committees.
Paul Higginbotham, 48, Madison, a circuit judge in Dane County, who touts the diversity of his background and his willingness to listen to people in court. If elected, he would be Wisconsin's first African American on the Supreme Court.
Pat Roggensack, 62, Madison, a judge on the Fourth District Court of Appeals who notes no sitting justice has been an appeals judge and says it's time for Wisconsin to examine and improve how its appeals courts operate in relation to the top court.
Brunner returned several times to his crusade against judges accepting money from political action committees. Recent scandals in Milwaukee County and at the Capitol are "a disgrace to our government" and PAC money doesn't belong in the court system, he said.
Higginbotham said "taking PAC money does not mean that one is dirty," and said television ads are an important way for candidates to introduce themselves to voters.
Roggensack said she doesn't think PAC money is an issue and it's "simply not accurate" to link it to the scandals.
An audience member asked the candidates about constitutional protection for abortion rights.
Roggensack said it's improper to take a position on an issue that could come before the court.
"I take no substantive position except to tell you that I will enforce the law," she said.
Brunner, too, said he could not discuss how he would rule on a potential future case, but said he believes in a woman's right to choose.
Higginbotham said Wisconsin "absolutely" needs a constitutional amendment protecting abortion rights. "It's about a woman's power over herself and a woman's ability to control her own life," he said.
The winner of the April 1 election will replace Justice William Bablitch, who is retiring.
|