madison.com  Marketplace | Jobs | Autos | Homes | Rentals | Obits | Weather | Archives  

WSJ homeAnnouncementsBook of businessClassifieds searchEntertainmentPhoto reprintsStory archivesContact staffEamil a letter to the editor

Reader Services
Subscribe
Renew your subscription
Temporary stop
Carrier opportunities
Newspapers In Education
> More reader services

Advertiser services:
Place a Classified ad
Media kit
Digital file requirements
> More advertiser services


Special reports
Madison public art
 
Community links
Freedom's answer
 

Tax code needs loophole reform
3:08 PM 7/06/03

The state Legislature made a mistake when it passed only half of a reform plan for corporate income taxes. It passed the half that gives corporations a tax break they deserve, but it didn't close a loophole that corporations don't deserve. Lawmakers ought to correct the error by passing the other half of the reform.

As part of the state budget, the Legislature simplified the way Wisconsin taxes corporations that do business in multiple states. Multi-state corporations pose a problem for state tax collectors: How much of a multi-state corporation's income is subject to tax by any given state? Wisconsin has taxed multi-state corporations according to a three-part formula based on in-state sales, property and employment. The Legislature's simplification cut that formula down to a single factor - in-state sales.

Corporations like the single-factor change because it will cut their taxes by a collective $45 million a year. But it also makes sense because the past formula taxed job creation, an unwise thing for a state to do to its economy.

The change has been sent with the rest of the budget to the governor, who supports it.

But with the single-factor change about to take effect, it's time to consider the change the Legislature failed to pass to complete the reform. Currently, state law allows a corporation to set up a subsidiary in a no-tax or low-tax state, transfer income to the subsidiary, and thus escape Wisconsin income taxes. Large banks commonly use the loophole to place income-earning securities in an out-of-state subsidiary.

The change the Legislature should have passed would require that all companies with common ownership submit a combined return. That would close the loophole.

Legislation requiring combined reporting of corporate income faces an uphill battle. Neither Doyle nor the majority of lawmakers favor combined reporting. They ought to change their minds.

The law now endorses a corporate scheme to evade state taxes. That's unfair to individual taxpayers and corporations that pay their

Copyright © 2002 Wisconsin State Journal


News from AP

Big question mark: Fate of health care in Senate

Army chaplain seeks prayers for meaning in rampage

La. Gov. declares state of emergency ahead of Ida

Iraq electoral law passes, sets up national vote

Afghan vows to keep corrupt officials out of govt

AP IMPACT: Framed for child porn _ by a PC virus

Pakistan bomb kills anti-Taliban mayor, 11 others

New fair targets France's 260,000 annual divorces

Carrey's 'Christmas Carol' wraps up $31M weekend

Oklahoma out of AP poll, Stanford in