Here's an anomaly in the annals of Wisconsin public policy: A land-use program that enjoys support not only of environmental activists but also real estate agents, builders and local governments.
<
It's called the Smart Growth law, and it's working so well, lawmakers want to repeal it.
<
Some anachronistic town government officials have hoodwinked Rep. Mary Williams, R-Medford, into introducing a bill (AB 435) that would repeal Smart Growth, which was approved as part of the 1999-01 state budget. The Assembly Rural Affairs Committee will hold a hearing Thursday on Williams' misinformed bill.
<
The law, now being applied in 700 communities statewide, is credited with preventing sprawl, protecting farmland and preserving the environment - without strangling local development.
<
To be sure, state government places a lot of onerous mandates on local communities - but Smart Growth isn't one of them. Critics seem to misunderstand the law willfully. Some have deliberately spread misinformation that state-supported planning is a back-door effort to abridge local property rights. Smart Growth has been wrongly blamed in disputes over zoning restrictions, natural resources regulations and other unrelated rules already on the books.
<
Smart Growth doesn't impose the state's will on local government or usurp local planning authority. But Smart Growth does:
<
Give local residents the power to guide development before it happens, instead of reacting to individual projects after they are proposed. The public participates in defining the key elements of an overall community development plan. Adjoining communities often work together.
<Provide state money to help local governments pay for planning. Communities qualify for state grants if their plans comply with the program's basic requirements. So far, the state has handed out 546 grants totaling $9.5 million.
<Enlist help from UW-Extension for communities that can't afford a full-time planner. While communities may choose to hire consultants to help them create a plan, that doesn't mean the outsiders are overruling local planners.
<The planning process is necessarily detailed and ambitious: Local folks and their leaders must agree on long-range plans for economic development, housing, transportation, resource conservation, and more.
<
To make this planning exercise more palatable, Rep. Sheryl Albers, R-Reedsburg, has proposed that the state scale back some Smart Growth plan requirements for towns with populations of less than about 750. That's an acceptable compromise to help achieve the state's goal of getting comprehensive plans enacted in most localities by 2010.
<
We suspect that some town officials oppose Smart Growth more out of parochialism than principle. They're probably irritated to discover that good planning saves tax money by guiding new development away from them toward more citified areas where public services can be provided more efficiently and at less cost to the property taxpayer.
<
But smart growth planning shouldn't be threatening to anyone who wants a good place to live. As rapid growth changes Wisconsin's landscape, especially in the north, it's essential that local officials get over their baseless suspicions and get to work.
<
Smart Growth helps local governments make better decisions about land use, housing, the environment and economic development - key factors that shape the quality of life in our communities. This comprehensive planning law truly is smart, and it should not be repealed.