Some Wisconsin State Journal readers responded negatively to a front-page story Monday (
sorry, PDF only) telling the tale of a U.S. soldier who deserted the armed forces and fled to Canada. For example:
I have been a long time subscriber to the WSJ, but after picking up the
paper today (12-11-2006) and seeing a story on page one about a deserter from
the Army and making he and his family out to be so wonderful and then turn to D3
and see the story of the young man and his family who gave the ultimate
sacrifice to this country, do not know if I can continue to subscribe to the
WSJ.
The article about the deserter made it appear he and his family were so
wonderful due to their "wanting peace." Who in this country, does not want
peace?? We are go about it in different ways.
I think that article was a slap in the face to all men and women who have
served, are serving and especially those families whose loved ones never
returned. I think that the WSJ should rethink what they put on page one. I
don't mind feel-good stories, but this one was not one of those and I am deeply
upset about the arrangement of these articles. The deserter story should have
been on D3 and the marine's story should have made page one.
Sheryl Hinze
A McFarland reader made the same complain about a story detailing
Rep. Marc Pocan's same-sex marriage:
First a front page article making a hero out of an army deserter; then, a
front page article about a same-sex marriage! Please cancel my
subscription.
Let me know when you hire a new Editor. Maybe I will resubscribe.
Thank you, Leonard Lane
Here's the gist of the response that I sent to these readers and others who registered the same objections:
Putting someone on the
front page isn't an editorial endorsement of their conduct. Otherwise our list
of media-anointed heroes could include accused killer Steven Avery, deposed
dictator Saddam Hussein and many others who have graced the front page for
activities that some or all of our readers might find
distasteful.
These folks just make
news. It's is interesting and important to inform readers that a lawmaker has
entered into a same-sex marriage even though state voters rejected same-sex and
civil unions in a referendum last month. It's interesting and important that a
small but growing number of soldiers are deserting the armed forces, conjuring
up recollections of the Vietnam era. We think our readers
should know about these developments.
I'm always interested
in what readers think about the news and our presentation of it, even if some of the
daily news diet isn't always palatable to you.You can add your comments to the forum on this post, or e-mail anytime with ideas and criticisms of other coverage.